Skip to main content

Misconception: Surrogates are usually the biological mothers of the child




In the heartland of California, a woman named Jennifer is packing a suitcase for what may be the most rewarding rendezvous she'll ever have - and she's done this twice before. Jennifer is about to give birth, but not to a child she’ll too soon cradle in her arms or nurture through nights filled with wild dreams. Jennifer is a surrogate, soon to deliver the joy of parenthood to a couple who, otherwise, may never know it. 


Beneath the umbrella of surrogacy, there is a pervasive misconception that surrogate mothers, like Jennifer, are always the biological mothers of the babies they carry. The story of Jennifer, however, like countless others, is irrefutable evidence that surrogacy is more nuanced than it appears in the collective societal psyche. 


Sunlight-painted myths can ensnare reality, it's important to unravel them, and one such tapestry of beliefs surrounds surrogacy: it's time to dissect these assumptions and reveal the truth. 


Firstly, it is crucial to clarify some terms. There are two primary types of surrogacy: traditional surrogacy and gestational surrogacy, and each comes with differing biological ties. In traditional surrogacy, the surrogate uses her eggs; she becomes both the carrier and the genetic contributor, therefore, the biological mother of the child. 


On the other hand, gestational surrogacy, used in the vast majority of modern surrogacies, does not require the surrogate’s natural eggs. As per a 2017 report of the Council for Responsible Genetics, 95% of surrogacy procedures now are gestational. That means the surrogate may carry the baby but doesn't share any genetic connection. Instead, the eggs come from either the intended mother or a separate egg donor.



Now, back to Jennifer. Today, Jennifer is a gestational surrogate bearing no genetic link to the child she is carrying. If a passer-by were to see her, heavy with child, and suppose she is the biological mother of the baby, they would, someone should correct them; But who would blame this spectator? The picture of surrogacy painted by popular culture and long-held assumptions seldom communicates the entire story. 


But why this confusion? One reason is history. Before assisted reproductive technology could allow for gestational surrogacy, 'traditional' was the only surrogacy, which was biologically linked. However, with the evolution of vitro fertilization (IVF) technology in the latter part of the 20th century, gestational surrogacy has gained significant ground. 


Injector of the sperm. Folder of the embroyo. Carrier of the child. The daisy-chain of creation is far removed from the simple garden where a seedling predictably follows a bud. Today's web of parenthood is a complex dance of biology, aspiration, and altruism, as the role of 'mother' extends beyond mere genetics. So why does this misconception continue to persist? 


Many surrogates, like Jennifer, report that onlookers, eager to make conversation and extend congratulations, still inquire about the child's father or commend the beautiful genetic mix between the surrogate and ‘her’ child. The idea of genetics equals parenthood maintains its stronghold, coloring beliefs about surrogacy. 


To dismantle these misconceptions, we must expand our understanding of "parenthood." The universal declaration of ‘Motherhood’ or being a ‘parent’ can be better defined by love and dedication rather than just sharing DNA. Perhaps this redefining of parenthood can shift the understanding of surrogacy as well. 


We dwell in an era where family and parenthood are no longer rigidly defined around genetic ties. Surrogacy seems to be skating the leading edge of that transition. Whether a woman is the genetic mother of the child she carries is irrelevant. Instead, her will to offer this altruistic gift, providing an opportunity for another to savor the sweetness of parenthood, transforms her into a different kind of hero. 


The experience of Jennifer, a surrogate mother, helps blow away the misconception. Armed with the truth about the numerous forms of surrogacy and their intricate expectations and processes, we can begin to see past inherited misconceptions. The unison of honor and knowledge can unravel the ambiguities that cloud the narratives of brave surrogates and too often reduce them to just 'biological mothers.’ It is a right step towards accepting the variance of family creation in our modern world. 


The page is turning, and with it, the understanding of what it means to build a family. We are learning to acknowledge that surrogates, like Jennifer, wear capes of resilience and love, and their stories deserve to be told in all their complex, beautiful truth. Surrogacy is not a cut-and-dry process; it's a symphony of love, passion, and sacrifice. Our perspectives must grow in step with these changes, embracing a definition of family that transcends mere genetics.




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Misconception: Intended parents have no say in the prenatal care of the surrogate.

Once upon a time, nestled in the heart of New York City, a young couple sat anxiously in a plush, carpeted waiting room. Samantha gripped her husband Jake’s hand, her eyes oscillating between the ticking clock and the closed office door. They were about to step into an uncharted territory – surrogacy. But a thought bubble above their heads carried the same unnerving question - Do intended parents have any say in the prenatal care of the surrogate? This overarching question has been a source of worry for many prospective intended parents. Conventional wisdom has fostered an erroneous belief that intended parents find themselves on the sidelines, watching passively without having any say in prenatal care once they choose to walk the path of surrogacy. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and the narrative much more empowering. Digging deeper into this myth, we discovered an intriguing plethora of data from a slew of studies and legal documents across many countries. One particular s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Misconception: Surrogacy agreements often result in legal battles over custody.

In 2006, a child was born in Modesto, California. A seemingly ordinary occurrence, regularly repeated thousands of times every day across the globe, but there was something peculiar about this particular birth. You see, the woman who had given birth was not the child's biological mother.  This woman was a surrogate, her womb rented by a couple unable to conceive, desperate for a child of their own. By way of good intentions, an embryo, the genetic product of this hopeful couple, was implanted inside the surrogate, and a few months later, a baby boy was born. But instead of passing the newborn into the waiting arms of the expectant parents, a dramatic legal tug-of-war ensued over who the baby rightfully belonged to. This tale of embattled surrogacy caught the media's attention and soon echoed across the entire country, sparking unease and caution around surrogacy agreements. Yet, in the shuffle of high-pitched media and conjured fears, a crucial detail was lost - this incident w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Misconception: Surrogacy is frowned upon by the majority of the public.

In the crisp predawn light, Chicago native Sarah Patterson kicked a tiled stone underfoot as she strolled along the crowded street. Its soft clatter bounced off the crumbled brickwork, dissipating into the morning fog. She wasn't thinking about the stone, nor indeed the precarious architecture around her. As she treaded her path alongside passersby rushing about their individual worlds, her thoughts were connected to an audacious concept— a concept of offering her body, her time and her life to fulfill the dreams of a couple unknown to her. In essence, she had made the life-altering decision to become a surrogate mother. The decision, however, was met with a parade of raised eyebrows and tsk-ing amongst her acquaintances—even some close friends. The thought echoed in the corners of her mind: "Isn't surrogacy frowned upon by a large majority of society?" This widespread belief, while seemingly grounded in the societal zeitgeist, warrants examination on account of its d...
Post a Comment
Read more