Skip to main content

Misconception: Surrogate children are often rejected by society and their peers.



It was the first day of fourth grade for little Alexander, standing tentatively at the classroom entrance, scanning the crowd of jubilant, chattering faces. Unlike his classmates, his summer break story was not about a two-week family road trip or a tour of Disneyland. Alexander was born through surrogacy, and he had spent the summer explaining this concept to his neighbours, relatives, and, now, his fourth-grade classmates.


Unfortunately, encounters like Alexander's provide a backdrop to the prevailing myth dominating our societal narrative - that children born through surrogacy are often rejected by their peers and society. Yet, a closer look at studies and experiences dispels such umbrella misconceptions. Instead, the narrative evolves into a chronicle of acceptance, love, and understanding.


A historical perspective elucidates how the advent of IVF and surrogacy reshaped family boundaries. Conventional ideals of a 'standard' family – a mother, a father, and their biological children – started to be debunked. However, change doesn't come easy, and the concept of surrogacy met with skepticism, nurturing the narrative of nonacceptance. Hence, a surface-level perspective prompts the reader to ponder: Are surrogate children indeed socially ostracized?


Instead of adopting this linear narrative, delving deeper into the anecdote of Alexander and countless other surrogate children, we find tales of acceptance. Research conducted by Susan Golombok, Director of the Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, revealed a more promising reality. Her studies gave insights into the psychological well-being, parent-child relationships, and the stigma associated with surrogacy families. Her research spanning 20 years, published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, reflects no significant difference between psychological well-being and social relationships of surrogate and natural-born children. 


The perspective of peer rejection is rooted in the fear of difference and the unfamiliarity of surrogacy as a concept. Indeed, humans tend to fear what they do not understand. Yet, removing the shroud of misunderstanding surrounding surrogacy brings forth the age-old adage: knowledge is power, in this case, the power to develop understanding and empathy.


Data suggests that it's not the child born through surrogacy that carries marks of rejection, but the concept itself. A 2017 study published in the Journal of Family Issues explores this reality, affirming that parental explanations about conception play a significant role in a child's self-concept and society's perception.


Some stories even serve as testimonies of transformation. Emily, a high-school student born through surrogacy, shared her experience in a symposium. She narrated a journey from an awkward 'show-and-tell' presentation about her unique birth in kindergarten to an impassioned explanation of surrogacy to her peer group in the 10th grade. It was not a tale of rejection, but rather a narrative of changing perspective and growing understanding. 


The anecdote of Emily, Alexander, and many such children showcase that it's indeed a stage where societal norms are being constantly redefined. Let's reflect - when did becoming a part of societal transformation become a symbol of rejection? Instead, these stories symbolize a glorious resistance against stigmatization, ushering in a new era of acceptance and empathy.


It's time to switch perspectives. Instead of viewing children born via surrogacy from the lens of societal rejection, we need to look at them as harbingers of progressive change. Society isn't static; it evolves and adapts, accommodating variations like surrogacy as part of the beautiful tapestry of diversity.


In conclusion, the social acceptance or rejection of surrogate children is more a reflection of society's understanding of surrogacy than the children involved. A more comprehensive, knowledgeable, and empathetic approach to surrogacy can create an environment of acceptance, turning perceived isolation into celebrated inclusivity. Consequently, surrogate children become catalysts, transcending societal norms and fostering acceptance.


So, the next time you encounter a surrogate family or a child, remember Alexander, remember Emily, and most importantly, remember that the labels we assign are often echoes of our understanding, or the lack thereof. Let's strive towards a society that replaces misconception with knowledge, rejection with acceptance, and fear with empathy.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Misconception: Same-sex couples face more legal hurdles in surrogacy than heterosexual couples.

Introduction It was a cold December morning when Maria handed over the newborn baby to the eagerly waiting couple, Joe and Sam. This was not Maria’s own child; she was a surrogate, and the parents were not the conventional couple you might envision. Joe and Sam were a loving, committed same-sex couple. They had turned to surrogacy under the weighty burden of a misleading perception, that as a same-sex couple, adoption would be a legal maze, much more onerous than for heterosexual counterparts. Context and Background This anecdote captures the dilemma faced by many same-sex couples who want to start a family. Joe and Sam, like many others, had set sail in the sea of surrogacy, driven by a widely held notion that same-sex couples face more substantial legal barriers in surrogacy than heterosexual couples. However, does this conventional wisdom hold water when we delve into solid research and hear from the experts? For a start, let's rewind a bit and clarify what we mean by surrogacy....

Misconception: Surrogates face long-term psychological trauma post-delivery.

Nancy, a soft-spoken woman in her mid-thirties from California, recently made an unusual gift, one that some might consider the greatest gift of all - she gave birth to a child for a couple she barely knew. She was a gestational surrogate. Nancy was carefully screened, her psychological and physical wellbeing scrutinized before she was declared fit. A few months after the delivery, she met me for coffee: radiant, genial, and exhibiting no signs of distress, tearing the age-old tapestry of psychological trauma associated with surrogacy. Our meeting set the stage for a deeper inquiry into the commonly perceived notion: A surrogate mother is destined to suffer long-term psychological trauma post-delivery. But data and research suggest the narrative might not run that dark and deep. A growing number of women, like Nancy, are venturing into surrogacy arrangements, opening their bodies and lives to create families for others. The public narrative - often spurred by dramatic film portrayals a...

Misconception: Intended parents have no say in the prenatal care of the surrogate.

Once upon a time, nestled in the heart of New York City, a young couple sat anxiously in a plush, carpeted waiting room. Samantha gripped her husband Jake’s hand, her eyes oscillating between the ticking clock and the closed office door. They were about to step into an uncharted territory – surrogacy. But a thought bubble above their heads carried the same unnerving question - Do intended parents have any say in the prenatal care of the surrogate? This overarching question has been a source of worry for many prospective intended parents. Conventional wisdom has fostered an erroneous belief that intended parents find themselves on the sidelines, watching passively without having any say in prenatal care once they choose to walk the path of surrogacy. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and the narrative much more empowering. Digging deeper into this myth, we discovered an intriguing plethora of data from a slew of studies and legal documents across many countries. One particular s...