Skip to main content

Misconception: Surrogate children are often rejected by society and their peers.



It was the first day of fourth grade for little Alexander, standing tentatively at the classroom entrance, scanning the crowd of jubilant, chattering faces. Unlike his classmates, his summer break story was not about a two-week family road trip or a tour of Disneyland. Alexander was born through surrogacy, and he had spent the summer explaining this concept to his neighbours, relatives, and, now, his fourth-grade classmates.


Unfortunately, encounters like Alexander's provide a backdrop to the prevailing myth dominating our societal narrative - that children born through surrogacy are often rejected by their peers and society. Yet, a closer look at studies and experiences dispels such umbrella misconceptions. Instead, the narrative evolves into a chronicle of acceptance, love, and understanding.


A historical perspective elucidates how the advent of IVF and surrogacy reshaped family boundaries. Conventional ideals of a 'standard' family – a mother, a father, and their biological children – started to be debunked. However, change doesn't come easy, and the concept of surrogacy met with skepticism, nurturing the narrative of nonacceptance. Hence, a surface-level perspective prompts the reader to ponder: Are surrogate children indeed socially ostracized?


Instead of adopting this linear narrative, delving deeper into the anecdote of Alexander and countless other surrogate children, we find tales of acceptance. Research conducted by Susan Golombok, Director of the Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, revealed a more promising reality. Her studies gave insights into the psychological well-being, parent-child relationships, and the stigma associated with surrogacy families. Her research spanning 20 years, published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, reflects no significant difference between psychological well-being and social relationships of surrogate and natural-born children. 


The perspective of peer rejection is rooted in the fear of difference and the unfamiliarity of surrogacy as a concept. Indeed, humans tend to fear what they do not understand. Yet, removing the shroud of misunderstanding surrounding surrogacy brings forth the age-old adage: knowledge is power, in this case, the power to develop understanding and empathy.


Data suggests that it's not the child born through surrogacy that carries marks of rejection, but the concept itself. A 2017 study published in the Journal of Family Issues explores this reality, affirming that parental explanations about conception play a significant role in a child's self-concept and society's perception.


Some stories even serve as testimonies of transformation. Emily, a high-school student born through surrogacy, shared her experience in a symposium. She narrated a journey from an awkward 'show-and-tell' presentation about her unique birth in kindergarten to an impassioned explanation of surrogacy to her peer group in the 10th grade. It was not a tale of rejection, but rather a narrative of changing perspective and growing understanding. 


The anecdote of Emily, Alexander, and many such children showcase that it's indeed a stage where societal norms are being constantly redefined. Let's reflect - when did becoming a part of societal transformation become a symbol of rejection? Instead, these stories symbolize a glorious resistance against stigmatization, ushering in a new era of acceptance and empathy.


It's time to switch perspectives. Instead of viewing children born via surrogacy from the lens of societal rejection, we need to look at them as harbingers of progressive change. Society isn't static; it evolves and adapts, accommodating variations like surrogacy as part of the beautiful tapestry of diversity.


In conclusion, the social acceptance or rejection of surrogate children is more a reflection of society's understanding of surrogacy than the children involved. A more comprehensive, knowledgeable, and empathetic approach to surrogacy can create an environment of acceptance, turning perceived isolation into celebrated inclusivity. Consequently, surrogate children become catalysts, transcending societal norms and fostering acceptance.


So, the next time you encounter a surrogate family or a child, remember Alexander, remember Emily, and most importantly, remember that the labels we assign are often echoes of our understanding, or the lack thereof. Let's strive towards a society that replaces misconception with knowledge, rejection with acceptance, and fear with empathy.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Misconception: Intended parents have no say in the prenatal care of the surrogate.

Once upon a time, nestled in the heart of New York City, a young couple sat anxiously in a plush, carpeted waiting room. Samantha gripped her husband Jake’s hand, her eyes oscillating between the ticking clock and the closed office door. They were about to step into an uncharted territory – surrogacy. But a thought bubble above their heads carried the same unnerving question - Do intended parents have any say in the prenatal care of the surrogate? This overarching question has been a source of worry for many prospective intended parents. Conventional wisdom has fostered an erroneous belief that intended parents find themselves on the sidelines, watching passively without having any say in prenatal care once they choose to walk the path of surrogacy. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and the narrative much more empowering. Digging deeper into this myth, we discovered an intriguing plethora of data from a slew of studies and legal documents across many countries. One particular s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Misconception: Surrogacy agreements often result in legal battles over custody.

In 2006, a child was born in Modesto, California. A seemingly ordinary occurrence, regularly repeated thousands of times every day across the globe, but there was something peculiar about this particular birth. You see, the woman who had given birth was not the child's biological mother.  This woman was a surrogate, her womb rented by a couple unable to conceive, desperate for a child of their own. By way of good intentions, an embryo, the genetic product of this hopeful couple, was implanted inside the surrogate, and a few months later, a baby boy was born. But instead of passing the newborn into the waiting arms of the expectant parents, a dramatic legal tug-of-war ensued over who the baby rightfully belonged to. This tale of embattled surrogacy caught the media's attention and soon echoed across the entire country, sparking unease and caution around surrogacy agreements. Yet, in the shuffle of high-pitched media and conjured fears, a crucial detail was lost - this incident w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Misconception: Surrogacy is frowned upon by the majority of the public.

In the crisp predawn light, Chicago native Sarah Patterson kicked a tiled stone underfoot as she strolled along the crowded street. Its soft clatter bounced off the crumbled brickwork, dissipating into the morning fog. She wasn't thinking about the stone, nor indeed the precarious architecture around her. As she treaded her path alongside passersby rushing about their individual worlds, her thoughts were connected to an audacious concept— a concept of offering her body, her time and her life to fulfill the dreams of a couple unknown to her. In essence, she had made the life-altering decision to become a surrogate mother. The decision, however, was met with a parade of raised eyebrows and tsk-ing amongst her acquaintances—even some close friends. The thought echoed in the corners of her mind: "Isn't surrogacy frowned upon by a large majority of society?" This widespread belief, while seemingly grounded in the societal zeitgeist, warrants examination on account of its d...
Post a Comment
Read more