Skip to main content

Misconception: Children born via surrogacy are less healthy than those conceived naturally.



In the quiet heart of a picturesque rural town, nursing a cup of steaming coffee whilst gazing out at the golden dawn, sat Rebecca. She was a mother to a lively three-year-old boy, sired from surrogacy. Yet, the lingering whispers around her constantly echoed an age-old misconception – her son was considered 'less healthy' because of the circumstances of his birth. But is this widespread belief rooted in reality, or is it merely a resounding echo of ignorance?


Historically, societal attitudes towards surrogacy have been complex and, often, controversial. Looking back, childbearing has been perceived as a sacred journey to parenthood for most civilizations. Any deviations from this perceived conventionality often garnered scrutiny. Simultaneously, developments in medical science and technology have opened up newer pathways to parenthood for couples struggling with infertility, making surrogacy one such beacon of hope.


While recognition and acceptance have progressively increased, skepticism regarding the health of children born via surrogacy persists. But does scientific evidence provide weight to this skepticism or does it compellingly disprove it?


To understand this, it is critical we first explore the processes involved in surrogacy within the context of an unprecedented rise in the number of prospective parents opting for this arrangement. Surrogacy involves a surrogate mother, who agrees to bear a child for an individual or couple, often assisted by In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) technologies. Biologically, the embryo implanted into the surrogate mother can be forged from the eggs and sperms of the intended parents, directly correlating to their genetic makeup.


A report published by the Journal of American Medical Association encompassed over a hundred studies comparing children born through IVF and natural conception. The publication noted that children born through assisted reproductive technologies, such as surrogacy, did not present a significant disparity in psychological, cognitive, or motor development compared to peers conceived naturally. 


Furthermore, numerous studies have found no discernible difference in the immune health of children born via surrogacy versus those conceived naturally. The scientific consensus points towards genetics and environmental factors playing a more substantial role in determining a child's health, rather than the method of conception.





A research study by the University of Cambridge highlighted another crucial factor, maternal health. The study found that surrogate mothers’ vitality significantly influence the health and wellbeing of the children they carry. Since surrogate mothers are carefully screened for medical and psychological health, contrary to popular belief, this could imply that children born via surrogacy might have a slightly better health start. 


The surrogate mother's commitment to nourishing her body during pregnancy also plays an equally significant role in the child’s wellbeing. Their health-conscious endeavors obviate the risk of common issues such as preterm birth or low birth weight. Evidence from a wide array of research studies undeniably deflates the myth that children conceived through surrogacy are less healthy.


Above all, a paper published in the Human Reproduction Journal, echoing previous findings, noted that the parent-child relationship's quality, regardless of natural conception or surrogacy, possesses a substantial impact on the child's growth and development. Parents of children born through surrogacy reported surprisingly lower levels of parenting stress and displayed stronger bonding, which positively impacted the children's psychological health.


The above facts unambiguously debunk the pervasive narrative suggesting negative health implications for surrogate-born children. In reality, surrogacy, coupled with advancements in modern medicine, has successfully aided thousands worldwide to realize their dream of parenthood, providing them with healthy and happy babies.


In the end, we return to our protagonist, Rebecca, cocooned in her world of love and nurture. Despite the whispering winds of misconception, she smiles, brimming with the confidence birthed from knowledge. As she sips her coffee, her gaze shifts back to her little boy, sleeping peacefully, blissfully unaware of societal judgments. For her, he embodies the perfect testament to the health and vibrancy of children conceived through surrogacy.


In an era of rapid scientific advancement and pervasive access to knowledge, it's incumbent upon us to challenge baseless myths and welcome the insights provided by sound research. At the core of this discussion is the celebration of life — a life made possible through surrogacy, as valuable, as vibrant, and indeed, as healthy as any other. Thus, society must seek to foster acceptance and shed outdated misconceptions for the realm of surrogacy, stepping ahead into an enlightened future.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Misconception: Same-sex couples face more legal hurdles in surrogacy than heterosexual couples.

Introduction It was a cold December morning when Maria handed over the newborn baby to the eagerly waiting couple, Joe and Sam. This was not Maria’s own child; she was a surrogate, and the parents were not the conventional couple you might envision. Joe and Sam were a loving, committed same-sex couple. They had turned to surrogacy under the weighty burden of a misleading perception, that as a same-sex couple, adoption would be a legal maze, much more onerous than for heterosexual counterparts. Context and Background This anecdote captures the dilemma faced by many same-sex couples who want to start a family. Joe and Sam, like many others, had set sail in the sea of surrogacy, driven by a widely held notion that same-sex couples face more substantial legal barriers in surrogacy than heterosexual couples. However, does this conventional wisdom hold water when we delve into solid research and hear from the experts? For a start, let's rewind a bit and clarify what we mean by surrogacy....

Misconception: Surrogates face long-term psychological trauma post-delivery.

Nancy, a soft-spoken woman in her mid-thirties from California, recently made an unusual gift, one that some might consider the greatest gift of all - she gave birth to a child for a couple she barely knew. She was a gestational surrogate. Nancy was carefully screened, her psychological and physical wellbeing scrutinized before she was declared fit. A few months after the delivery, she met me for coffee: radiant, genial, and exhibiting no signs of distress, tearing the age-old tapestry of psychological trauma associated with surrogacy. Our meeting set the stage for a deeper inquiry into the commonly perceived notion: A surrogate mother is destined to suffer long-term psychological trauma post-delivery. But data and research suggest the narrative might not run that dark and deep. A growing number of women, like Nancy, are venturing into surrogacy arrangements, opening their bodies and lives to create families for others. The public narrative - often spurred by dramatic film portrayals a...

Misconception: Intended parents have no say in the prenatal care of the surrogate.

Once upon a time, nestled in the heart of New York City, a young couple sat anxiously in a plush, carpeted waiting room. Samantha gripped her husband Jake’s hand, her eyes oscillating between the ticking clock and the closed office door. They were about to step into an uncharted territory – surrogacy. But a thought bubble above their heads carried the same unnerving question - Do intended parents have any say in the prenatal care of the surrogate? This overarching question has been a source of worry for many prospective intended parents. Conventional wisdom has fostered an erroneous belief that intended parents find themselves on the sidelines, watching passively without having any say in prenatal care once they choose to walk the path of surrogacy. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and the narrative much more empowering. Digging deeper into this myth, we discovered an intriguing plethora of data from a slew of studies and legal documents across many countries. One particular s...