Skip to main content

Misconception: Intended parents might exploit surrogates in developing countries.




Over sixteen years ago, in a bustling Mumbai hospital, Rama encountered the height of her womanhood - bearing a child. But unlike most childbirths, Rama wasn’t weaving dreams of her newborn’s future; instead, she had signed a contract to carry someone else’s dreams. As an illiterate woman from a remote village, she keenly grabbed the opportunity to be a surrogate, a decision anchored in her desperate financial crunch. Unfortunately, Rama’s story teetered towards the edge of exploitation, tainting the notion of international surrogacy in developing countries.


International surrogacy is wrapped in a complex tapestry of ethical, socio-economic, and emotional threads — presenting misconceptions that intended parents might exploit surrogates in developing countries. To disentangle the narratives run a mile wide and deep, we need to dive where the truth hides.


First, let’s unpack the common assumption that surrogates in developing countries are coerced into surrogacy for financial gain. On the surface, this may sound plausible, given the profound poverty levels these women come from. Yet, evidence from a study by the University of Sussex speaks otherwise. It revealed that many surrogates enter into surrogacy arrangements voluntarily – driven by a profound urge to help others and raise their family’s financial standing.


Contrary to the belief that surrogates are passive victims, a study by the Center for Social Research in India reports that surrogates are knowledgeable about their role and rights in the process and willingly sign up to carry other's dreams. In Brazil, where surrogacy arrangements are altruistic, surrogates often cite emotional satisfaction as their primary motivation rather than economic gain, as a study in the Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology divulges.


Another prevailing assumption: intended parents are exploitative. However, this ignores the genuine emotional complexities of both parties. There are countless stories of meaningful relationships forged between intended parents and surrogates that go beyond the transactional dynamics. A study published by the British Journal of Sociology relays powerful anecdotes of intended parents offering emotional, moral, and sometimes, financial support, well after the birth, far exceeding the requirements of the surrogacy contract.


Yet, we cannot deny the existence of exploitation in surrogacy, which usually arises from lack of regulation and oversight. For instance, the absence of comprehensive regulation in countries like India and Nepal has led to malpractices in the past. Therefore, if there's a villain in this narrative, it should be inadequate regulation and uncaring intermediaries who often profit from the vulnerable surrogate's lack of awareness.


Information and protections are keys to alleviating potential exploitation. Intended parents and surrogates must be well aware of their rights, risks, and responsibilities entering the arrangement. Furthermore, ethical guidelines and programs that educate and protect all parties involved are critical in enhancing the framework of international surrogacy.


Let's illustrate with the case of California, where a robust surrogacy model exists. The California legislature provides for a clear, legal framework outlining the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in surrogacy. The state's emphasis on psychological counseling ensures surrogates make informed decisions with full knowledge of their emotional, physical, and mental implications, as established by the Journal of Law and Health.


In conclusion, while the fears of exploitation in international surrogacy are genuine, painting all intended parents with the same exploitative brush is a stretch. What we need is to obliterate the darkness of ignorance with the light of information, regulation, and empathy – pushing for a more predictable and fairer surrogacy framework. The road might be long, but not impossible — just as Rama, reborn from the trials of exploitation, who now stands as a fearless advocate for surrogates’ rights.


Therefore, as we navigate this topic, let’s remember to engage with it with the complexity it deserves. Let's approach surrogacy from a standpoint of understanding rather than judgment, promoting a narrative of empowerment over exploitation. Because while surrogacy insists on creating new life, it should also safeguard the life of the surrogate who makes it possible.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Misconception: Intended parents have no say in the prenatal care of the surrogate.

Once upon a time, nestled in the heart of New York City, a young couple sat anxiously in a plush, carpeted waiting room. Samantha gripped her husband Jake’s hand, her eyes oscillating between the ticking clock and the closed office door. They were about to step into an uncharted territory – surrogacy. But a thought bubble above their heads carried the same unnerving question - Do intended parents have any say in the prenatal care of the surrogate? This overarching question has been a source of worry for many prospective intended parents. Conventional wisdom has fostered an erroneous belief that intended parents find themselves on the sidelines, watching passively without having any say in prenatal care once they choose to walk the path of surrogacy. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and the narrative much more empowering. Digging deeper into this myth, we discovered an intriguing plethora of data from a slew of studies and legal documents across many countries. One particular s...

Misconception: Surrogacy agreements often result in legal battles over custody.

In 2006, a child was born in Modesto, California. A seemingly ordinary occurrence, regularly repeated thousands of times every day across the globe, but there was something peculiar about this particular birth. You see, the woman who had given birth was not the child's biological mother.  This woman was a surrogate, her womb rented by a couple unable to conceive, desperate for a child of their own. By way of good intentions, an embryo, the genetic product of this hopeful couple, was implanted inside the surrogate, and a few months later, a baby boy was born. But instead of passing the newborn into the waiting arms of the expectant parents, a dramatic legal tug-of-war ensued over who the baby rightfully belonged to. This tale of embattled surrogacy caught the media's attention and soon echoed across the entire country, sparking unease and caution around surrogacy agreements. Yet, in the shuffle of high-pitched media and conjured fears, a crucial detail was lost - this incident w...

Misconception: Surrogacy is frowned upon by the majority of the public.

In the crisp predawn light, Chicago native Sarah Patterson kicked a tiled stone underfoot as she strolled along the crowded street. Its soft clatter bounced off the crumbled brickwork, dissipating into the morning fog. She wasn't thinking about the stone, nor indeed the precarious architecture around her. As she treaded her path alongside passersby rushing about their individual worlds, her thoughts were connected to an audacious concept— a concept of offering her body, her time and her life to fulfill the dreams of a couple unknown to her. In essence, she had made the life-altering decision to become a surrogate mother. The decision, however, was met with a parade of raised eyebrows and tsk-ing amongst her acquaintances—even some close friends. The thought echoed in the corners of her mind: "Isn't surrogacy frowned upon by a large majority of society?" This widespread belief, while seemingly grounded in the societal zeitgeist, warrants examination on account of its d...