Skip to main content

Misconception: Intended parents might exploit surrogates in developing countries.




Over sixteen years ago, in a bustling Mumbai hospital, Rama encountered the height of her womanhood - bearing a child. But unlike most childbirths, Rama wasn’t weaving dreams of her newborn’s future; instead, she had signed a contract to carry someone else’s dreams. As an illiterate woman from a remote village, she keenly grabbed the opportunity to be a surrogate, a decision anchored in her desperate financial crunch. Unfortunately, Rama’s story teetered towards the edge of exploitation, tainting the notion of international surrogacy in developing countries.


International surrogacy is wrapped in a complex tapestry of ethical, socio-economic, and emotional threads — presenting misconceptions that intended parents might exploit surrogates in developing countries. To disentangle the narratives run a mile wide and deep, we need to dive where the truth hides.


First, let’s unpack the common assumption that surrogates in developing countries are coerced into surrogacy for financial gain. On the surface, this may sound plausible, given the profound poverty levels these women come from. Yet, evidence from a study by the University of Sussex speaks otherwise. It revealed that many surrogates enter into surrogacy arrangements voluntarily – driven by a profound urge to help others and raise their family’s financial standing.


Contrary to the belief that surrogates are passive victims, a study by the Center for Social Research in India reports that surrogates are knowledgeable about their role and rights in the process and willingly sign up to carry other's dreams. In Brazil, where surrogacy arrangements are altruistic, surrogates often cite emotional satisfaction as their primary motivation rather than economic gain, as a study in the Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology divulges.


Another prevailing assumption: intended parents are exploitative. However, this ignores the genuine emotional complexities of both parties. There are countless stories of meaningful relationships forged between intended parents and surrogates that go beyond the transactional dynamics. A study published by the British Journal of Sociology relays powerful anecdotes of intended parents offering emotional, moral, and sometimes, financial support, well after the birth, far exceeding the requirements of the surrogacy contract.


Yet, we cannot deny the existence of exploitation in surrogacy, which usually arises from lack of regulation and oversight. For instance, the absence of comprehensive regulation in countries like India and Nepal has led to malpractices in the past. Therefore, if there's a villain in this narrative, it should be inadequate regulation and uncaring intermediaries who often profit from the vulnerable surrogate's lack of awareness.


Information and protections are keys to alleviating potential exploitation. Intended parents and surrogates must be well aware of their rights, risks, and responsibilities entering the arrangement. Furthermore, ethical guidelines and programs that educate and protect all parties involved are critical in enhancing the framework of international surrogacy.


Let's illustrate with the case of California, where a robust surrogacy model exists. The California legislature provides for a clear, legal framework outlining the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in surrogacy. The state's emphasis on psychological counseling ensures surrogates make informed decisions with full knowledge of their emotional, physical, and mental implications, as established by the Journal of Law and Health.


In conclusion, while the fears of exploitation in international surrogacy are genuine, painting all intended parents with the same exploitative brush is a stretch. What we need is to obliterate the darkness of ignorance with the light of information, regulation, and empathy – pushing for a more predictable and fairer surrogacy framework. The road might be long, but not impossible — just as Rama, reborn from the trials of exploitation, who now stands as a fearless advocate for surrogates’ rights.


Therefore, as we navigate this topic, let’s remember to engage with it with the complexity it deserves. Let's approach surrogacy from a standpoint of understanding rather than judgment, promoting a narrative of empowerment over exploitation. Because while surrogacy insists on creating new life, it should also safeguard the life of the surrogate who makes it possible.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Misconception: Same-sex couples face more legal hurdles in surrogacy than heterosexual couples.

Introduction It was a cold December morning when Maria handed over the newborn baby to the eagerly waiting couple, Joe and Sam. This was not Maria’s own child; she was a surrogate, and the parents were not the conventional couple you might envision. Joe and Sam were a loving, committed same-sex couple. They had turned to surrogacy under the weighty burden of a misleading perception, that as a same-sex couple, adoption would be a legal maze, much more onerous than for heterosexual counterparts. Context and Background This anecdote captures the dilemma faced by many same-sex couples who want to start a family. Joe and Sam, like many others, had set sail in the sea of surrogacy, driven by a widely held notion that same-sex couples face more substantial legal barriers in surrogacy than heterosexual couples. However, does this conventional wisdom hold water when we delve into solid research and hear from the experts? For a start, let's rewind a bit and clarify what we mean by surrogacy....

Misconception: Surrogates face long-term psychological trauma post-delivery.

Nancy, a soft-spoken woman in her mid-thirties from California, recently made an unusual gift, one that some might consider the greatest gift of all - she gave birth to a child for a couple she barely knew. She was a gestational surrogate. Nancy was carefully screened, her psychological and physical wellbeing scrutinized before she was declared fit. A few months after the delivery, she met me for coffee: radiant, genial, and exhibiting no signs of distress, tearing the age-old tapestry of psychological trauma associated with surrogacy. Our meeting set the stage for a deeper inquiry into the commonly perceived notion: A surrogate mother is destined to suffer long-term psychological trauma post-delivery. But data and research suggest the narrative might not run that dark and deep. A growing number of women, like Nancy, are venturing into surrogacy arrangements, opening their bodies and lives to create families for others. The public narrative - often spurred by dramatic film portrayals a...

Misconception: Intended parents have no say in the prenatal care of the surrogate.

Once upon a time, nestled in the heart of New York City, a young couple sat anxiously in a plush, carpeted waiting room. Samantha gripped her husband Jake’s hand, her eyes oscillating between the ticking clock and the closed office door. They were about to step into an uncharted territory – surrogacy. But a thought bubble above their heads carried the same unnerving question - Do intended parents have any say in the prenatal care of the surrogate? This overarching question has been a source of worry for many prospective intended parents. Conventional wisdom has fostered an erroneous belief that intended parents find themselves on the sidelines, watching passively without having any say in prenatal care once they choose to walk the path of surrogacy. However, the reality is far more nuanced, and the narrative much more empowering. Digging deeper into this myth, we discovered an intriguing plethora of data from a slew of studies and legal documents across many countries. One particular s...